The AI workspace for legal professionals

  • Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
  • Document automation
  • Matter management
  • Hosted in the EU and Switzerland

Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)

Try for freeBook a demo

Revision dismissed in labor law salary dispute

BAG 4 AZR 165/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court dismissed the plaintiff’s revision against the judgment of the Hessian Regional Labour Court. The decision was issued without a full statement of facts and reasons because the parties, in view of a parallel proceeding, waived those parts of the judgment. The plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; waiver of findings and reasons in the presence of a parallel proceeding. Where the parties validly dispense with statement of facts and reasons, the Federal Labour Court may decide the revision in abbreviated form. The revision is dismissed if the appellate judgment is not shown to contain reversible error; the costs of the revision follow the unsuccessful challenge.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 165/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 165/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 236/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 322/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 322/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisionlabour lawcostsparallel proceedingswaiver of reasons

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the LAG judgment was successful

Extracted holding

The revision was unfounded and therefore dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

The Federal Labour Court saw no reason to disturb the appellate judgment; in view of the parallel case the parties had waived statement of facts and reasons.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.