The AI workspace for legal professionals

  • Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
  • Document automation
  • Matter management
  • Hosted in the EU and Switzerland

Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)

Try for freeBook a demo

Revision dismissed in labor dispute; costs borne by claimant

BAG 4 AZR 177/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court dismissed the claimant’s revision against the judgment of the Hessian Labour Court of Appeal. The decision states that, in light of a parallel case, the parties waived a full statement of facts and reasons. The claimant was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO: Where the parties waive a statement of facts and reasons in view of a parallel proceeding, the Federal Labour Court may decide without a full written reasoning. A revision that is found unfounded is to be dismissed; the unsuccessful revising party bears the costs of the revision.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 177/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 177/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 189/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 334/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 334/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisioncostsparallel proceedingslabor lawappellate review

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the claimant’s revision against the appellate judgment was successful

Extracted holding

The revision was unsuccessful and the appellate judgment remained in force.

Extracted reasoning

The Federal Labour Court saw no basis to disturb the appellate judgment and therefore rejected the revision.

Key legal question

Allocation of the costs of the revision

Extracted holding

The claimant must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the revision failed, the claimant was ordered to bear the costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.