The AI workspace for legal professionals

  • Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
  • Document automation
  • Matter management
  • Hosted in the EU and Switzerland

Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)

Try for freeBook a demo

Revision dismissed in labor dispute

BAG 4 AZR 171/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court decided a revision in an employment dispute arising from the judgments of the Arbeitsgericht Darmstadt and the Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht. In view of a parallel proceeding (4 AZR 50/13), the parties waived the statement of facts and reasons. The court dismissed the claimant's revision and ordered the claimant to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; where the parties waive the statement of facts and reasons in light of a parallel proceeding, the judgment may be rendered without a full written reasoning. In revision proceedings, dismissal of the revision entails cost liability of the losing party.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 171/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 171/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 192/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 328/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 328/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

employment disputerevisioncostsparallel proceedingswaiver of reasons

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the claimant's revision against the Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht judgment should succeed

Extracted holding

The revision was dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

No reasons were set out because, in light of the parallel case, the parties waived the statement of facts and reasons pursuant to the cited procedural provisions.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs of the revision

Extracted holding

The claimant must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

The losing party bears the revision costs under the dispositive order.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.