The AI workspace for legal professionals

  • Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
  • Document automation
  • Matter management
  • Hosted in the EU and Switzerland

Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)

Try for freeBook a demo

Revision dismissed; costs borne by plaintiff

BAG 4 AZR 203/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labor Court dismissed the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Hessian LAG in an employment case. The parties had waived findings of fact and reasons because of a parallel proceeding. The court therefore only entered the dispositive ruling and ordered the plaintiff to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; where the parties waive findings of fact and reasons in view of a parallel proceeding, the Federal Labor Court may decide by judgment without a full statement of reasons. If the revision is dismissed, the appellant bears the costs of the revision.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 203/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 203/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 182/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 361/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 361/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

employment lawrevisioncostswaiver of reasonsparallel proceedings

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the Hessian LAG judgment should be successful.

Extracted holding

The revision was unsuccessful and the appellate judgment remained in force.

Extracted reasoning

The Federal Labor Court dismissed the revision; no separate factual or legal reasoning was set out because the parties waived findings and reasons in light of a parallel case.

Key legal question

Allocation of the costs of the revision.

Extracted holding

The plaintiff must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the revision failed, the plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.