Revision dismissed in labor collective-agreement dispute

BAG 4 AZR 192/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labor Court dismissed the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Hessian Regional Labor Court in a labor matter. The decision was rendered without findings of fact or reasons because the parties, in light of a parallel case, waived the statement of facts and the reasons for the decision. The plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; waiver of findings of fact and reasons in a parallel case. Where the parties waive the statement of facts and reasons, the court may issue a judgment without a full factual and reasons section. If the revision is unsuccessful, it is dismissed and the revising party bears the costs of the revision proceedings.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 192/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 192/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 174/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 349/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 349/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisioncostswaiver of reasonsparallel proceedingslabor law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the appellate judgment should succeed

Extracted holding

The revision was unsuccessful and the appellate judgment remained unchanged.

Extracted reasoning

The court dismissed the revision; the decision was issued without factual findings and reasons because the parties waived them in view of a parallel proceeding.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs for the revision proceedings

Extracted holding

The plaintiff must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the revision was unsuccessful, the plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.