Revision dismissed in labor pay dispute

BAG 4 AZR 204/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labor Court, 4th Senate, dismissed the plaintiff's revision against the Hessian Regional Labor Court. The court proceeded without a full statement of facts and reasons because, in view of the parallel case 4 AZR 50/13, the parties waived them. The only dispositive points were the failure of the revision and the resulting cost order against the plaintiff.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; waiver of findings of fact and reasons in a revision judgment. Where the parties waive the statement of facts and reasons in view of a parallel proceeding, the court may render a shortened judgment without a full factual exposition. If the revision is unsuccessful, it is to be dismissed and the revision costs are borne by the appellant.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 204/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 204/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 234/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 362/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 362/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisioncostswaiver of reasonslabor lawparallel proceedings

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the Hessian Regional Labor Court judgment was successful.

Extracted holding

The revision had no merit and was dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

The court rejected the revision; the document indicates that, in light of the parallel proceeding, the parties waived findings of fact and reasons under the cited procedural provisions.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs of the revision proceedings.

Extracted holding

The plaintiff had to bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the revision failed, the plaintiff was ordered to bear the revision costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.