The AI workspace for legal professionals

  • Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
  • Document automation
  • Matter management
  • Hosted in the EU and Switzerland

Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)

Try for freeBook a demo

Revision dismissed in labor law wage dispute

BAG 4 AZR 213/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labor Court dismissed the claimant's revision against the Hessian State Labor Court judgment. The decision was issued without statement of facts or reasons because the parties had waived them in view of parallel proceedings. The claimant was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO: Where the parties waive the statement of facts and reasons in light of parallel proceedings, the Federal Labor Court may render a judgment without reasons; the revision is to be dismissed if it is unfounded, with costs following the outcome.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 213/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 213/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 249/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 377/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 377/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisioncostswaiver of reasonsparallel proceedingslabor law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the claimant's revision against the Hessian LAG judgment was well-founded.

Extracted holding

The revision was unfounded and therefore dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

The court rejected the revision without setting out facts or reasons, relying on the parties' waiver in light of the parallel case.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs of the revision proceedings.

Extracted holding

The claimant must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the revision failed, the costs followed the outcome.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.