Revision dismissed in parallel labor case

BAG 4 AZR 211/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labor Court dismissed the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Hessian LAG. Because the parties had waived the statement of facts and reasons in light of parallel case 4 AZR 50/13, the Senate issued a short judgment. The plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; waiver of facts and reasons in a parallel case. If the parties waive the statement of facts and the reasons, the Federal Labor Court may dispense with a full written judgment and issue a shortened decision. The omission of the reasons does not affect the admissibility or disposition of the revision; the procedural consequence is limited to the form of the judgment. Costs follow the outcome of the unsuccessful revision.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 211/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 211/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 176/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 375/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 375/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisioncostswaiver of reasonsparallel proceedingslabor court

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the Hessian LAG judgment should succeed.

Extracted holding

The revision was unsuccessful and the appeal was dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

The judgment was rendered without factual findings and reasons because, in light of the parallel proceeding, the parties had waived them under the applicable procedural rules.

Key legal question

Who bears the costs of the revision proceedings.

Extracted holding

The plaintiff must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the revision failed, the plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.