The AI workspace for legal professionals

  • Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
  • Document automation
  • Matter management
  • Hosted in the EU and Switzerland

Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)

Try for freeBook a demo

Revision dismissed in wage agreement dispute

BAG 4 AZR 218/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court dismissed the plaintiff’s revision against the judgment of the Hessian Labour Court. The court issued no substantive reasons because the parties had waived findings of fact and reasons in light of a parallel proceeding. The plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO: Where the parties, in view of a parallel proceeding, waive findings of fact and reasons, the Federal Labour Court may decide the revision without a full statement of reasons. A revision dismissed in this manner leaves the challenged appellate judgment in force; the costs of the revision are borne by the unsuccessful appellant.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 218/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 218/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 164/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 382/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 382/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisioncostswaiver of reasonsparallel proceedingsemployment law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the Hessian Labour Court judgment was well-founded

Extracted holding

The revision was unfounded and was dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

The court gave no detailed reasons because the parties waived findings of fact and reasons under the procedural rules applicable in light of the parallel case.

Key legal question

Allocation of revision costs

Extracted holding

The plaintiff had to bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

Costs followed the dismissal of the revision.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.