The AI workspace for legal professionals

  • Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
  • Document automation
  • Matter management
  • Hosted in the EU and Switzerland

Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)

Try for freeBook a demo

Revision dismissed in collective labor dispute

BAG 4 AZR 214/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court dismissed the plaintiff’s revision against the judgment of the Hessian Regional Labour Court. The decision was rendered without a full statement of facts and reasons because, in view of parallel proceedings 4 AZR 50/13, the parties waived them. The plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO: If the parties waive the statement of facts and reasons in view of parallel proceedings, the Federal Labour Court may decide the revision without setting out the facts and reasoning in full. A dismissed revision entails the costs of the revision for the appellant.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 214/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 214/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 247/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 378/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 378/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG , § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisioncostswaiver of reasonsparallel proceedingslabor law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff’s revision should be upheld against the appellate judgment.

Extracted holding

The revision was unsuccessful; the appellate judgment remained in force.

Extracted reasoning

The court rejected the revision. The decision was issued under a waiver of statement of facts and reasons in view of the parallel case.

Key legal question

Allocation of the costs of the revision proceedings.

Extracted holding

The plaintiff must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the revision was dismissed, the plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.