The AI workspace for legal professionals

  • Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
  • Document automation
  • Matter management
  • Hosted in the EU and Switzerland

Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)

Try for freeBook a demo

Revision dismissed; plaintiff bears revision costs

BAG 4 AZR 223/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court dismissed the plaintiff’s revision against the judgment of the Hessian Regional Labour Court. The court did not set out the facts or reasons because, in view of a parallel case, the parties had waived them. The only operative points are the rejection of the revision and the allocation of revision costs to the plaintiff.

Omnilex headnote

Art. 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; Art. 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; Art. 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; where the parties waive statement of facts and reasons, the Federal Labour Court may issue a shortened judgment. If the revision is dismissed, the revising party bears the costs of the revision.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 223/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 223/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 239/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 387/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 387/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisioncostswaiver of reasonsparallel proceedingslabour law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the appellate judgment was successful

Extracted holding

The revision was unfounded and was dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

The court rejected the revision; the document contains only the dispositive part and refers to the waiver of facts and reasons in light of a parallel proceeding.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs for the revision

Extracted holding

The plaintiff must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the revision failed, the costs were imposed on the plaintiff.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.