The AI workspace for legal professionals

  • Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
  • Document automation
  • Matter management
  • Hosted in the EU and Switzerland

Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)

Try for freeBook a demo

Revision dismissed in labor law appeal

BAG 4 AZR 235/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The plaintiff sought revision of a judgment of the Hessian Regional Labor Court in a labor case. The Federal Labor Court, 4th Senate, did not issue a full statement of facts or reasons because the parties waived them in view of a parallel proceeding. The court rejected the revision and ordered the plaintiff to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; where the parties waive findings of fact and reasons in view of a parallel proceeding, the Federal Labor Court may decide accordingly without a full written reasoning. If the revision is unfounded, it is to be dismissed and the costs of the revision are borne by the unsuccessful appellant.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 235/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 235/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 209/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 428/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 428/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisionlabor lawparallel proceedingswaiver of reasonscosts

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the Hessian Regional Labor Court judgment should be upheld.

Extracted holding

The revision was unsuccessful and was rejected.

Extracted reasoning

The court resolved the case without a full statement of facts and reasons because the parties had waived them in light of a parallel proceeding.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.