The AI workspace for legal professionals

  • Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
  • Document automation
  • Matter management
  • Hosted in the EU and Switzerland

Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)

Try for freeBook a demo

Revision dismissed in employment classification dispute

BAG 4 AZR 206/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court dismissed the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Hessian Regional Labour Court. The case was decided without a statement of facts and reasons because the parties had waived them in view of a parallel proceeding. The plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO: Where the parties waive the statement of facts and reasons in view of a parallel proceeding, the appellate court may issue a short-form judgment without reasons. If the revision is dismissed, the unsuccessful appellant bears the costs of the revision proceedings.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 206/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 206/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 232/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 370/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 370/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisioncostsshort-form judgmentwaiver of reasonsparallel proceedings

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the Hessian Regional Labour Court judgment should succeed.

Extracted holding

The revision was rejected.

Extracted reasoning

The decision contains only the operative part; the parties waived the statement of facts and reasons in view of a parallel proceeding.

Key legal question

Who bears the costs of the revision proceedings?

Extracted holding

The plaintiff must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

Costs followed the dismissal of the revision.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.