The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
BAG 3 AZR 1030/12•Revision dismissed in employment pension dispute
BAG 3 AZR 1030/12Bag / Division 3Oct 21, 2014Dismissed
Extracted by Omnilex
The Federal Labour Court dismissed the claimant's revision against the judgment of the LAG Düsseldorf. The court noted that the parties had waived the statement of facts and reasons under § 313a ZPO. The claimant was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.
§ 313a ZPO; revision dismissed without detailed reasons where the parties waive statement of facts and reasons. If the revision is unfounded, it is to be dismissed and the unsuccessful party bears the costs of the revision.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-10-21
Aktenzeichen: 3 AZR 1030/12
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Mönchengladbach, 10. November 2011, Az: 4 Ca 2259/11, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Düsseldorf, 16. August 2012, Az: 13 Sa 31/12, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 3. Senat
Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Düsseldorf vom 16. August 2012 - 13 Sa 31/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.
Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.
1 Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 313a ZPO) .
| Zwanziger | Schlewing | Spinner | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rau | Schepers |
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the claimant's revision against the LAG Düsseldorf judgment was admissible and well-founded
The revision was unfounded and had to be dismissed.
The court rejected the revision; the published extract gives no further reasons because the parties waived the statement of facts and reasons under § 313a ZPO.
Allocation of costs of the revision
The claimant must bear the costs of the revision.
As the revision failed, the costs were imposed on the claimant.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.