The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
BAG 10 AZR 47/15•Revision successful; interest only from 2012-12-04
BAG 10 AZR 47/15Bag / Division 10Jan 13, 2016Modified
Extracted by Omnilex
In this employment case, the Federal Labour Court granted the claimant's revision, set aside the judgment of the Baden-Württemberg Regional Labour Court, and dismissed the defendant's appeal against the Ulm Labour Court judgment. The lower-court result was maintained in substance, but the obligation to pay interest was limited to interest accruing only from 4 December 2012. The defendant was ordered to bear the costs of the appeal and revision proceedings. The decision notes that the parties waived a statement of facts and reasons under Section 313a ZPO.
Art. 313a ZPO; waiver of statement of facts and reasons; where the parties validly waive a full reasoning, the appellate court may confine itself to the operative part. On revision, the Federal Labour Court may set aside the appellate judgment and restore the first-instance result with a limited correction of the operative part, if only a specific ancillary consequence such as the commencement of default interest requires adjustment. The costs of the higher-instance proceedings follow the outcome of the revision and appeal.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2016-01-13
Aktenzeichen: 10 AZR 47/15
ECLI: ECLI:DE:BAG:2016:130116.U.10AZR47.15.0
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Ulm, 17. Januar 2014, Az: 6 Ca 228/13, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Baden-Württemberg, 26. November 2014, Az: 6 Sa 22/14, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 10. Senat
Auf die Revision des Klägers wird das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Baden-Württemberg vom 26. November 2014 - 6 Sa 22/14 - aufgehoben.
Die Berufung der Beklagten gegen das Urteil des Arbeitsgerichts Ulm - Kammern Ravensburg - vom 17. Januar 2014 - 6 Ca 228/13 - wird mit der Maßgabe zurückgewiesen, dass Zinsen erst ab dem 4. Dezember 2012 zu zahlen sind.
Die Beklagte hat die Kosten der Berufung und Revision zu tragen.
1 Die Parteien haben gemäß § 313a ZPO auf die Darstellung von Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründen verzichtet.
| Linck | W. Reinfelder | Brune | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kiel | Züfle |
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the claimant's revision against the appellate judgment should be upheld.
The revision was successful and the appellate judgment was set aside.
The Federal Labour Court corrected the appellate court's decision and reinstated the first-instance result, subject only to a correction of the interest commencement date.
Whether the defendant's appeal against the first-instance judgment should succeed.
The defendant's appeal was dismissed, but the interest obligation was limited to interest from 2012-12-04.
The operative part of the first-instance judgment was maintained in substance; only the interest start date required modification.
Who bears the costs of the appeal and revision proceedings?
The defendant must bear the costs of the appeal and revision.
The losing party was ordered to pay the costs of the higher-instance proceedings.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.