Revision dismissed in labor dispute

BAG 4 AZR 466/16Bag / Division 4Mar 22, 2017Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labor Court dismissed the claimant's revision against the Baden-Württemberg Regional Labor Court judgment. The excerpt contains no substantive reasoning, only a note that the parties waived findings of fact and reasons because of a parallel case (4 AZR 462/16). Costs of the revision were imposed on the claimant.

Omnilex headnote

Art. 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO: Where the parties waive findings of fact and reasons, the court may decide without a full statement of facts and reasons, particularly in a parallel case constellation. On revision, dismissal of the appeal entails allocation of costs to the unsuccessful appellant; the decision itself contains no further substantive elaboration.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 466/16, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2017-03-22

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 466/16

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BAG:2017:220317.U.4AZR466.16.0

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Karlsruhe, 7. Oktober 2015, Az: 5 Ca 275/15, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Baden-Württemberg, 11. März 2016, Az: 9 Sa 48/15, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

Die Revision der Klägerin gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Baden-Württemberg - Kammern Freiburg - vom 11. März 2016 - 9 Sa 48/15 - wird auf ihre Kosten zurückgewiesen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf die Entscheidung in dem Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 462/16 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

EylertKloseRinck
J. RatayczakRupprecht

Keywords

revisioncostslabor lawparallel casewaiver of reasons

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the claimant's revision against the regional labor court judgment should succeed

Extracted holding

The revision was rejected.

Extracted reasoning

No substantive reasoning is provided in the excerpt; the decision notes a waiver of findings of fact and reasons in light of a parallel case.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs for the revision proceedings

Extracted holding

The claimant had to bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

The costs follow from the dismissal of the revision.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.