The AI workspace for legal professionals

  • Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
  • Document automation
  • Matter management
  • Hosted in the EU and Switzerland

Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)

Try for freeBook a demo

Revision dismissed in labor dispute

BAG 4 AZR 467/16Bag / Division 4Mar 22, 2017Dismissed

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court dismissed the plaintiff's revision against the Baden-Württemberg Labour Court judgment and ordered the plaintiff to bear the costs. The decision was issued without findings of fact or reasons because the parties waived them in light of a parallel case (4 AZR 462/16).

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; where the parties waive the statement of facts and reasons in view of a parallel proceeding, the Federal Labour Court may decide without a detailed written reasoning. In such a case, the revision is disposed of by a summary dismissal order on the merits or otherwise in the operative part, with costs following the outcome.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 467/16, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2017-03-22

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 467/16

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BAG:2017:220317.U.4AZR467.16.0

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Karlsruhe, 7. Oktober 2015, Az: 5 Ca 216/15, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Baden-Württemberg, 11. März 2016, Az: 9 Sa 52/15, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

Die Revision der Klägerin gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Baden-Württemberg - Kammern Freiburg - vom 11. März 2016 - 9 Sa 52/15 - wird auf ihre Kosten zurückgewiesen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf die Entscheidung in dem Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 462/16 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

EylertKloseRinck
J. RatayczakRupprecht

Keywords

revisioncostsparallel proceedingwaiver of reasonslabor law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the LAG Baden-Württemberg judgment should be allowed

Extracted holding

The revision was rejected.

Extracted reasoning

The decision contains no substantive reasoning because the parties waived the statement of facts and reasons in view of the parallel case.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.