The AI workspace for legal professionals

  • Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
  • Document automation
  • Matter management
  • Hosted in the EU and Switzerland

Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)

Try for freeBook a demo

Revision dismissed in labor law appeal

BAG 4 AZR 472/16Bag / Division 4Mar 22, 2017Dismissed

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labor Court dismissed the claimant's revision against the Baden-Württemberg Regional Labor Court judgment. The court decided the matter in line with a parallel case and, because the parties waived findings of fact and reasons, issued a shortened judgment. The only operative consequence recorded in the tenor is that the claimant must bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO: Where the parties waive findings of fact and reasons in a labor-law revision case, the Federal Labor Court may issue a shortened judgment without full factual and legal reasons; the revision is dismissed when the court resolves the case in accordance with a parallel proceeding. The costs of the unsuccessful revision fall on the appellant.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 472/16, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2017-03-22

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 472/16

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BAG:2017:220317.U.4AZR472.16.0

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Karlsruhe, 7. Oktober 2015, Az: 5 Ca 218/15, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Baden-Württemberg, 11. März 2016, Az: 11 Sa 75/15, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

Die Revision der Klägerin gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Baden-Württemberg - Kammern Freiburg - vom 11. März 2016 - 11 Sa 75/15 - wird auf ihre Kosten zurückgewiesen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf die Entscheidung in dem Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 462/16 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

EylertKloseRinck
J. RatayczakRupprecht

Keywords

revisionlabor lawcostsparallel proceedingwaiver of reasons

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the claimant's revision against the regional labor court judgment should be allowed or dismissed.

Extracted holding

The revision was dismissed; the appellate judgment remained in force.

Extracted reasoning

The Federal Labor Court decided the case by reference to the parallel proceeding and, consistent with the parties' waiver, did not set out findings of fact or reasons.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.