Revision dismissed in labour law parallel case

BAG 4 AZR 473/16Bag / Division 4Mar 22, 2017Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court dismissed the plaintiff’s revision against the judgment of the Regional Labour Court of Baden-Württemberg. Because the case was linked to a parallel proceeding, the parties waived a statement of facts and reasons under the cited procedural provisions. The only dispositive consequence expressed in the tenor is that the plaintiff bears the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO: In a revision decided in parallel with another case, the court may dispense with a statement of facts and reasons where the parties waive it. If the revision is unsuccessful, it is dismissed at the appellant's cost; the tenor alone may suffice where the judgment is rendered without detailed reasons under the statutory exceptions.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 473/16, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2017-03-22

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 473/16

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BAG:2017:220317.U.4AZR473.16.0

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Karlsruhe, 7. Oktober 2015, Az: 5 Ca 286/15, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Baden-Württemberg, 11. März 2016, Az: 11 Sa 77/15, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

Die Revision der Klägerin gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Baden-Württemberg - Kammern Freiburg - vom 11. März 2016 - 11 Sa 77/15 - wird auf ihre Kosten zurückgewiesen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf die Entscheidung in dem Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 462/16 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

EylertKloseRinck
J. RatayczakRupprecht

Keywords

revisioncostsparallel proceedingswaiver of reasonslabour law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the appellate labour judgment was successful.

Extracted holding

The revision had no success and was dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

The Federal Labour Court simply rejected the revision; the document notes that, in view of the parallel case, the parties waived findings of fact and reasons.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.