Revision dismissed in labor law appeal

BAG 4 AZR 469/16Bag / Division 4Mar 22, 2017Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labor Court dismissed the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Baden-Württemberg Regional Labor Court. The court ordered the plaintiff to bear the costs. The decision was issued without detailed findings because the parties waived them in light of a parallel proceeding.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; waiver of findings in a parallel case: Where the parties waive statement of facts and reasons, the court may dispense with a full written judgment if the statutory requirements are met. A revision dismissed on the merits leaves the appellate judgment in force and entails cost liability of the revising party under the ordinary cost rule.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 469/16, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2017-03-22

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 469/16

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BAG:2017:220317.U.4AZR469.16.0

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Karlsruhe, 7. Oktober 2015, Az: 5 Ca 214/15, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Baden-Württemberg, 11. März 2016, Az: 11 Sa 72/15, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

Die Revision der Klägerin gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Baden-Württemberg - Kammern Freiburg - vom 11. März 2016 - 11 Sa 72/15 - wird auf ihre Kosten zurückgewiesen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf die Entscheidung in dem Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 462/16 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

EylertKloseRinck
J. RatayczakRupprecht

Keywords

revisioncostswaiver of reasonsparallel caselabor law appeal

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the appellate judgment should succeed

Extracted holding

The revision was unsuccessful and the appellate judgment remained in force.

Extracted reasoning

The Federal Labor Court dismissed the revision and referred, by implication, to the reasoning in the parallel case.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs for the revision proceedings

Extracted holding

The plaintiff had to bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the revision was dismissed, costs were imposed on the revising plaintiff.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.