Revision dismissed in employment dispute

BAG 6 AZR 705/16Bag / Division 6Jul 27, 2017Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labor Court dismissed the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Thüringer Landesarbeitsgericht. The court therefore left the lower-court judgment in place and ordered the plaintiff to bear the costs of the revision. The decision was issued without a statement of facts or reasons, as the parties had waived the statement of facts and the reasons under § 313a ZPO.

Omnilex headnote

§ 313a ZPO; waiver of statement of facts and reasons in appellate proceedings; if the parties waive Tatbestand and Entscheidungsgründe, the court may issue a shortened judgment. In such a case, only the operative part and the essential disposition are recorded; no detailed reasons are set out. The procedural waiver does not affect the validity of the judgment or the allocation of costs resulting from the unsuccessful revision.

Full text

BAG — 6 AZR 705/16, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2017-07-27

Aktenzeichen: 6 AZR 705/16

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BAG:2017:270717.U.6AZR705.16.0

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Gera, 2. September 2015, Az: 7 Ca 305/14, Urteilvorgehend Thüringer Landesarbeitsgericht, 13. September 2016, Az: 1 Sa 244/16, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 6. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Thüringer Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 13. September 2016 - 1 Sa 244/16 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 313a ZPO) .

FischermeierGallnerKrumbiegel
WollensakSteinbrück

Keywords

revisioncostsemployment disputewaiver of reasonsappellate judgment

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the appellate judgment was successful.

Extracted holding

The revision was unsuccessful and was dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

The Federal Labor Court found no grounds to overturn the appellate judgment.

Key legal question

Allocation of the costs of the revision.

Extracted holding

The plaintiff had to bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the revision failed, the plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.