The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
BVerfG 1 BvR 1002/13•Non-admission of constitutional complaint over press seats
BVerfG 1 BvR 1002/13Bverfg / 1. Senat 3. KammerApr 12, 2013Inadmissible
Extracted by Omnilex
The First Senate’s Third Chamber of the Federal Constitutional Court dealt with a constitutional complaint concerning the allocation of press seats in the NSU proceedings. It refused legal aid and appointment of counsel because the complaint offered no sufficient prospect of success. The complaint was not admitted for decision pursuant to § 93d(1) sentence 3 BVerfGG. As a consequence, the request for an interim injunction also became moot. The decision is final and unappealable.
§ 114 S. 1 ZPO analog; § 93d Abs. 1 S. 3 BVerfGG; constitutional complaint with no sufficient prospect of success: legal aid may be refused, and the complaint may be rejected without a reasoned decision. Where the main complaint is not admitted, a request for interim relief loses its independent object and need not be decided separately. The Chamber may dispense with a statement of reasons under the statutory exception for non-admission decisions.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2013-04-12
Aktenzeichen: 1 BvR 1002/13
ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2013:rk20130412.1bvr100213
Dokumenttyp: Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung
Normen: § 93d Abs 1 S 3 BVerfGG, § 176 GVG, § 114 S 1 ZPO
Spruchkörper: 1. Senat 3. Kammer
Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung: Vergabe von Presseplätzen im "NSU-Verfahren"
Der Antrag auf Bewilligung von Prozesskostenhilfe und Beiordnung eines Rechtsanwalts wird abgelehnt, weil die Verfassungsbeschwerde keine hinreichende Aussicht auf Erfolg bietet (§ 114 Satz 1 ZPO analog).
Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.
Damit erledigt sich zugleich der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung.
1 Von einer Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.
2 Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether legal aid and appointment of counsel should be granted for the constitutional complaint
No. The complaint had no sufficient prospect of success within the meaning of the analogous rule on legal aid.
Because the constitutional complaint lacked sufficient prospects of success, the conditions for legal aid and appointment of counsel were not met.
Whether the constitutional complaint should be admitted for decision
No. The complaint was not admitted.
The Chamber dispensed with a reasoned decision under the applicable provision and refused acceptance.
Whether the request for an interim injunction should still be decided
No separate decision was needed because the request became moot once the complaint was not admitted.
The fate of the principal complaint rendered the interim relief request without independent object.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.