The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
BVerfG 1 BvR 2436/10•Non-admission of constitutional complaint on rehabilitation decision
BVerfG 1 BvR 2436/10Bverfg / 1. Senat 2. KammerJul 4, 2013Inadmissible
Extracted by Omnilex
The Federal Constitutional Court, sitting as a chamber, issued a non-reasoned decision not to accept the constitutional complaint. The complaint concerned the legal effect and scope of an administrative rehabilitation notice under rehabilitation law. The challenged lower-court decisions were the Federal Administrative Court's order of 15 July 2010 and the Magdeburg Administrative Court's judgment of 10 November 2009.
§ 93d Abs. 1 S. 3 BVerfGG; non-admission of a constitutional complaint by chamber order without reasons. Where the chamber does not accept a constitutional complaint for decision, the complaint is not examined on the merits and no substantive constitutional assessment is provided. The non-admission order is a procedural disposition ending the proceedings at the constitutional court level; it does not imply a merits ruling on the challenged lower-court decisions or on the underlying administrative-law question.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2013-07-04
Aktenzeichen: 1 BvR 2436/10
Dokumenttyp: Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung
Normen: § 93d Abs 1 S 3 BVerfGG, § 1 Abs 7 VermG
Vorinstanz: vorgehend BVerwG, 15. Juli 2010, Az: 8 B 4/10, Beschlussvorgehend VG Magdeburg, 10. November 2009, Az: 5 A 306/08 MD, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 1. Senat 2. Kammer
Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung: Verwaltungsrechtliche Rehabilitierung - Wirkung und Reichweite des Rehabilitierungsbescheids
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the constitutional complaint should be accepted for decision
The complaint was not accepted.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.