The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
BVerfG 2 BvR 3/16•Costs and value fixation after constitutional complaint is terminated
BVerfG 2 BvR 3/16Bverfg / Division 2Jul 13, 2016Other
Extracted by Omnilex
The Federal Constitutional Court discontinued the constitutional complaint proceedings after the complainant declared the matter resolved. As a result, the application for interim relief also became moot. The Court ordered the Federal Republic of Germany to reimburse the complainant’s necessary expenses because the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees had amended the challenged decision after renewed review. It also fixed the object value at EUR 10,000 for the constitutional complaint and EUR 5,000 for the interim relief application.
§ 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG; cost reimbursement after declaration of mootness in constitutional complaint proceedings; if the authority amends the challenged act following renewed review, reimbursement of necessary expenses is appropriate. § 14 Abs. 1 RVG, § 37 Abs. 2 S. 2 RVG; object value is to be fixed separately for the main constitutional complaint and for ancillary interim relief proceedings, according to the significance and scope of the matter.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2016-07-13
Aktenzeichen: 2 BvR 3/16
ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2016:rs20160713.2bvr000316
Dokumenttyp: Gegenstandswertfestsetzung im verfassungsgerichtlichen Verfahren
Normen: § 34a Abs 3 BVerfGG, § 14 Abs 1 RVG, § 37 Abs 2 S 2 RVG
Vorinstanz: vorgehend VG Frankfurt, 4. Dezember 2015, Az: 7 L 5687/15.F.A, Beschlussvorgehend VG Frankfurt, 26. November 2015, Az: 7 L 5489/15.F.A., Beschluss
Spruchkörper: 2. Senat
Gegenstandswertfestsetzung und Anordnung der Auslagenerstattung im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren mit Tenorbegründung
Das Verfahren wird eingestellt, nachdem der Beschwerdeführer es für erledigt erklärt hat.
Damit erledigt sich der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung.
Die Bundesrepublik Deutschland hat dem Beschwerdeführer die notwendigen Auslagen gemäß § 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG zu erstatten, da das Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge den streitgegenständlichen Bescheid nach nochmaliger Prüfung abgeändert hat.
Der Gegenstandswert wird für das Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren auf 10.000 Euro (in Worten: zehntausend Euro) und für das Verfahren auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung auf 5.000 Euro (in Worten: fünftausend Euro) festgesetzt.
Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the constitutional complaint proceedings should be terminated after the complainant declared the case resolved
The proceedings were discontinued after the complainant declared them resolved.
Once the complainant declared the matter resolved, the constitutional complaint proceedings no longer required a merits decision.
Whether the request for interim relief remained pending
The request for an interim injunction became moot.
Termination of the main constitutional complaint rendered the request for interim relief without separate purpose.
Whether the complainant was entitled to reimbursement of necessary expenses
Necessary expenses had to be reimbursed by the Federal Republic of Germany.
Because the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees amended the challenged decision after reconsideration, reimbursement under § 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG was justified.
What amount of object value should be set for the constitutional complaint and the interim relief request
The object value was set at EUR 10,000 for the constitutional complaint and EUR 5,000 for the interim relief proceedings.
The court fixed the value separately for the main constitutional complaint and the interim relief application under the applicable RVG provisions.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.