The AI workspace for legal professionals

  • Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
  • Document automation
  • Matter management
  • Hosted in the EU and Switzerland

Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)

Try for freeBook a demo

Correction of factual statement in non-admission order

BVerfG 2 BvR 877/16Bverfg / 2. Senat 1. KammerDec 8, 2016Granted

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Constitutional Court corrected a factual statement in the reasons of its non-admission order of 25 August 2016. The corrected wording clarified that the complainant has been a judge at the Federal Fiscal Court since 2005 and deputy chair since 2013. The decision states that it is not subject to appeal.

Omnilex headnote

§ 319 ZPO; correction of manifest inaccuracies in the factual recital of a constitutional court order; factual errors in the reasons of a decision may be corrected by a separate ruling where the correction does not affect the substantive outcome but only removes an obvious inaccuracy in the statement of facts.

Full text

BVerfG — 2 BvR 877/16, Kammerbeschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2016-12-08

Aktenzeichen: 2 BvR 877/16

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2016:rk20161208.2bvr087716

Dokumenttyp: Kammerbeschluss

Normen: § 90 BVerfGG, § 319 ZPO

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof, 16. Februar 2016, Az: 6 CE 16.246, Beschlussvorgehend Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof, 26. Januar 2016, Az: 6 CE 15.2800, Beschlussvorgehend VG München, 19. Januar 2016, Az: M 5 E 15.5395, Beschlussvorgehend VG München, 18. Dezember 2015, Az: M 5 E 15.5395, Beschlussvorgehend BVerfG, 25. August 2016, Az: 2 BvR 877/16, Nichtannahmebeschluss

Spruchkörper: 2. Senat 1. Kammer

Titelzeile

Berichtigung im Sachbericht eines Nichtannahmebeschlusses

Tenor

Der Beschluss der 1. Kammer des Zweiten Senats vom 25. August 2016 wird in Satz 1 der Randnummer 2 (unter Gründe: A. I. 1.) wie folgt berichtigt (Änderung unterstrichen): Die Beschwerdeführerin ist seit 2005 Richterin am Bundesfinanzhof und seit 2013 stellvertretende Vorsitzende.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.

Keywords

correction of judgmentfactual errorconstitutional complaintnon-admission orderprocedural correction

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the prior non-admission order should be corrected in its factual recital under § 319 ZPO.

Extracted holding

The factual statement in sentence 1 of paragraph 2 was corrected to state that the complainant has been a judge at the Federal Fiscal Court since 2005 and deputy chair since 2013.

Extracted reasoning

The court treated the matter as a permissible correction of an obvious inaccuracy in the reasons of its earlier order.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.