The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
BVerfG 2 BvR 743/17•Constitutional complaint against removal order not admitted
BVerfG 2 BvR 743/17Bverfg / 2. Senat 1. KammerApr 4, 2017Inadmissible
Extracted by Omnilex
The First Chamber of the Second Senate of the Federal Constitutional Court did not admit the constitutional complaint against a removal order under Section 58a Residence Act. It also rejected the applicant’s request for legal aid and appointment of attorney Rechtsanwältin I. because the intended complaint had no sufficient prospect of success. As a consequence, the request for interim relief was moot.
§ 93d Abs. 1 S. 3 BVerfGG; constitutional complaint against a removal order under § 58a AufenthG: where the intended constitutional challenge offers no sufficient prospect of success, the complaint need not be admitted. In such a case, legal aid and appointment of counsel are to be refused for want of prospective success. An application for interim relief dependent on the main proceedings becomes moot once the complaint is not admitted.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2017-04-04
Aktenzeichen: 2 BvR 743/17
ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2017:rk20170404.2bvr074317
Dokumenttyp: Nichtannahmebeschluss
Normen: § 93d Abs 1 S 3 BVerfGG, § 58a AufenthG 2004
Vorinstanz: vorgehend BVerwG, 21. März 2017, Az: 1 VR 2/17, Beschluss
Spruchkörper: 2. Senat 1. Kammer
Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung: Erfolglose Verfassungsbeschwerde gegen Abschiebungsanordnung gem § 58a AufenthGjuris: AufenthG 2004
Der Antrag auf Bewilligung von Prozesskostenhilfe und Beiordnung von Rechtsanwältin I. wird abgelehnt, weil die beabsichtigte Rechtsverfolgung keine hinreichende Aussicht auf Erfolg bietet.
Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.
Damit erledigt sich der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung.
Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the constitutional complaint should be admitted for decision
The complaint was not admitted.
The Court found no sufficient prospect of success for the intended constitutional challenge; the complaint was therefore not taken up for decision.
Whether legal aid and appointment of counsel should be granted
Legal aid was denied because the intended legal action had no sufficient prospect of success.
Without a sufficient chance of success, the prerequisites for granting legal aid and appointing counsel were not met.
Whether interim relief should be ordered
The request for an interim injunction became moot once the complaint was not admitted.
The main constitutional complaint was no longer pending, so the ancillary interim request was disposed of accordingly.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.