BAföG update request and social security flat-rate calculation

BVerwG 5 B 90/12, 5 B 90/12 (5 C 6/13)Bverwg / Division 5Feb 4, 2013Granted

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Administrative Court upheld the claimant's complaint and admitted the revision. It considered the case capable of clarifying how the flat-rate deduction for social security contributions under Section 21(2) BAföG must be calculated when employment circumstances change and an update request under Section 24(3) BAföG is made. The court relied on the case's fundamental importance under Section 132(2) No. 1 VwGO.

Omnilex headnote

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; revision admissibility for fundamental importance in BAföG update proceedings; the requirement of fundamental importance is satisfied where a case raises a clarified legal question on the determination of the flat-rate allowance for social security expenses under § 21 Abs. 2 BAföG in connection with changed employment conditions and an update request under § 24 Abs. 3 BAföG.

Full text

BVerwG — 5 B 90/12, 5 B 90/12 (5 C 6/13), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2013-02-04

Aktenzeichen: 5 B 90/12, 5 B 90/12 (5 C 6/13)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 21 Abs 2 BAföG, § 24 Abs 3 BAföG

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Sächsisches Oberverwaltungsgericht, 13. September 2012, Az: 1 A 486/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 5. Senat

Titelzeile

BAföG: Aktualisierungsantrag; Aufwendungen zur sozialen Sicherung

Gründe

1 Die Beschwerde des Klägers ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

2 Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit geben, die Frage der richtigen Ermittlung der Pauschale für Aufwendungen zur sozialen Sicherung im Sinne des § 21 Abs. 2 BAföG bei sich ändernden Berufsverhältnissen und darauf beruhenden Aktualisierungsanträgen im Sinne von § 24 Abs. 3 BAföG zu klären.

Keywords

BAföGrevision admissibilityfundamental importancesocial security contributionsupdate request

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether revision should be admitted for fundamental importance under Section 132(2) No. 1 VwGO in a BAföG update-request case.

Extracted holding

Revision was admitted because the case could clarify how the flat-rate allowance for social security expenses under Section 21(2) BAföG is to be determined when employment relations change and update requests are made under Section 24(3) BAföG.

Extracted reasoning

The question raised is capable of clarification in revision proceedings and concerns a point of general significance.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.