The AI workspace for legal professionals

  • Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
  • Document automation
  • Matter management
  • Hosted in the EU and Switzerland

Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)

Try for freeBook a demo

Revision allowed on travel ban period for asylum beneficiaries

BVerwG 1 B 4/13Bverwg / Division 1Sep 12, 2013Granted

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Administrative Court granted the defendant's complaint and admitted the revision. It held that the case raised a question of fundamental importance concerning whether, when fixing the ban period under § 11(1) AufenthG, the requirement of prior departure may be waived for persons entitled to asylum. Because revision was allowed on that ground, the other asserted grounds no longer needed to be addressed.

Omnilex headnote

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; admissibility of revision for fundamental importance; the revision is to be admitted where the case presents a legally unresolved question of general significance and offers an occasion to clarify the conditions under which, in determining the duration of the ban effect under § 11(1) AufenthG, the requirement of prior departure may be dispensed with for asylum beneficiaries. Once this ground is established, further grounds for leave need not be examined.

Full text

BVerwG — 1 B 4/13, Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2013-09-12

Aktenzeichen: 1 B 4/13

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 11 Abs 1 AufenthG 2004, § 132 Abs 2 Nr 1 VwGO

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Verwaltungsgerichtshof Baden-Württemberg, 5. Dezember 2012, Az: 11 S 739/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 1. Senat

Titelzeile

Befristung der Sperrwirkung einer Ausweisung; Erfordernis der vorherigen Ausreise; Revisionszulassung

Gründe

1 Die Beschwerde des Beklagten ist zulässig und begründet.

2 Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur weiteren Klärung der Frage geben, unter welchen Voraussetzungen bei Asylberechtigten bei Festsetzung der Sperrfrist nach § 11 Abs. 1 AufenthG vom Erfordernis der vorherigen Ausreise abgesehen werden kann.

3 Auf die von der Beschwerde weiter geltend gemachten Zulassungsgründe kommt es danach nicht mehr an.

Keywords

revisionfundamental importanceexpulsionban periodasylum beneficiariesprior departure requirement

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether revision should be admitted for the question of suspending the prior-departure requirement when setting the ban period under § 11(1) AufenthG for asylum beneficiaries.

Extracted holding

Revision was admitted because the case had fundamental importance and could clarify under which conditions the prior-departure requirement may be dispensed with.

Extracted reasoning

The legal question was not yet sufficiently clarified and was capable of further development by the Federal Administrative Court.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.