BEM’s relevance to civil servant retirement on disability

BVerwG 2 B 29/12, 2 B 29/12 (2 C 37/13)Bverwg / Division 2Sep 24, 2013Granted

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Administrative Court granted the complaint against non-admission of revision. It held that the case has fundamental significance because it may clarify what relevance workplace integration management under Section 84(2) sentence 1 SGB IX has for placing a civil servant into retirement for disability under former Article 56(1) sentence 2 BayBG.

Omnilex headnote

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; admission of revision for fundamental significance; relevance of workplace integration management under § 84 Abs. 2 sentence 1 SGB IX for retirement of a civil servant under former Art. 56 Abs. 1 sentence 2 BayBG. A complaint against denial of leave to appeal is well-founded where the appealed decision raises an unresolved question of law whose clarification is capable of affecting the legality of retirement for disability. The need for clarification of the legal significance of BEM in civil-service retirement proceedings may constitute fundamental importance warranting admission of revision.

Full text

BVerwG — 2 B 29/12, 2 B 29/12 (2 C 37/13), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2013-09-24

Aktenzeichen: 2 B 29/12, 2 B 29/12 (2 C 37/13)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 84 Abs 2 S 1 SGB 9, Art 56 Abs 1 S 2 BG BY 1998, § 132 Abs 2 Nr 1 VwGO

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof, 11. Januar 2012, Az: 3 B 10.346, Beschluss

Spruchkörper: 2. Senat

Titelzeile

Dienstunfähigkeit; Versetzung in den Ruhestand; betriebliches Eingliederungsmanagement; Revisionszulassung

Gründe

1 Die Beschwerde ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, welche Bedeutung dem betrieblichen Eingliederungsmanagement (BEM) gemäß § 84 Abs. 2 Satz 1 SGB IX für die Zurruhesetzung eines Beamten gemäß Art. 56 Abs. 1 Satz 2 BayBG a.F. zukommt.

Keywords

revision admissionfundamental importancecivil servant retirementdisabilityworkplace integration management

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether revision should be admitted for fundamental importance because the legal significance of workplace integration management under Section 84(2) sentence 1 SGB IX for retirement of a civil servant under former Article 56(1) sentence 2 BayBG is unresolved.

Extracted holding

Revision was admitted because the case raises a question of fundamental significance requiring clarification by the Federal Administrative Court.

Extracted reasoning

The court considered the complaint admissible and well-founded. The unresolved relationship between the statutory workplace integration management and retirement for disability could affect the legality of placing a civil servant into retirement, justifying review under Section 132(2) No. 1 VwGO.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.