The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
BVerwG 5 B 26/13, 5 B 26/13 (5 C 36/13)•Revision admitted over private clinic inpatient reimbursement
BVerwG 5 B 26/13, 5 B 26/13 (5 C 36/13)Bverwg / Division 5Oct 7, 2013Granted
Extracted by Omnilex
The Federal Administrative Court upheld the defendant's complaint and allowed the revision. It found that the case raises a question of fundamental importance under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, namely the reasonableness and reimbursement eligibility of costs for inpatient accommodation in a private clinic under § 5 Abs. 1 sentence 1 BVO BW. The decision does not resolve the merits of the beihilfe claim; it only opens the revision stage.
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; leave to appeal for fundamental importance; reimbursement of inpatient treatment costs in a private clinic. A revision is to be admitted when the proceedings raise a legally significant, unresolved and generalizable question of law whose clarification is capable of affecting the outcome of the case. This may be the case where the assessment of the reasonableness of expenses for inpatient accommodation in a private clinic under § 5 Abs. 1 sentence 1 BVO BW requires clarification. The admissibility threshold is met if the appeal identifies a concrete abstract legal question needing review; the merits are not pre-judged by the admission decision.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2013-10-07
Aktenzeichen: 5 B 26/13, 5 B 26/13 (5 C 36/13)
Dokumenttyp: Beschluss
Normen: § 5 Abs 1 S 1 BhV BW 1995, § 132 Abs 2 Nr 1 VwGO
Vorinstanz: vorgehend Verwaltungsgerichtshof Baden-Württemberg, 21. Dezember 2012, Az: 2 S 874/12, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 5. Senat
Stationäre Unterbringung in einer Privatklinik; Beihilfefähigkeit der Aufwendungen; Revisionszulassung
1 Die Beschwerde des Beklagten ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zugelassen.
2 Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit geben, die Frage der Angemessenheit von Aufwendungen gemäß § 5 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BVO BW bei der stationären Unterbringung in einer Privatklinik zu klären.
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the requirements for leave to appeal based on fundamental importance are met under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO.
Yes. The complaint is admissible and well-founded; revision is granted because the case raises a fundamental question.
The court considered that revision could clarify the issue of whether expenses for inpatient accommodation in a private clinic are reasonable within the meaning of § 5 Abs. 1 sentence 1 BVO BW.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.