The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
BVerwG 7 B 29/13, 7 B 29/13 (7 C 8/14)•Revision admitted on commercial waste collection by partnerships
BVerwG 7 B 29/13, 7 B 29/13 (7 C 8/14)Bverwg / Division 7Apr 16, 2014Granted
Extracted by Omnilex
The Federal Administrative Court allowed the revision in a waste-law dispute. It held that the case has fundamental significance because a revision court can clarify whether partnerships may act as collectors of waste under Section 3(10) KrWG and when a commercial collection ends. The decision also set the dispute value for the complaint and revision proceedings under the cited GKG provisions.
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; fundamental importance of the matter justifying admission of revision. A case is of fundamental significance where revision proceedings can clarify abstract questions of law that have not yet been sufficiently resolved, here whether partnerships may act as collectors within the meaning of § 3 Abs. 10 KrWG and under which conditions a commercial collection is terminated. The dispute value is to be determined separately for complaint and revision proceedings under the applicable provisions of the GKG.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-04-16
Aktenzeichen: 7 B 29/13, 7 B 29/13 (7 C 8/14)
Dokumenttyp: Beschluss
Normen: § 132 Abs 2 Nr 1 VwGO, § 3 Abs 10 KrWG
Vorinstanz: vorgehend Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof, 26. September 2013, Az: 20 BV 13.516, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 7. Senat
Revisionszulassung; gewerbliche Sammlung von Abfällen
1 Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO) zuzulassen. In einem Revisionsverfahren können die Fragen geklärt werden, ob Personengesellschaften als Sammler von Abfällen im Sinne von § 3 Abs. 10 KrWG tätig sein können und unter welchen Voraussetzungen eine gewerbliche Sammlung beendet ist.
2 Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 und 3 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren aus § 47 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether revision should be admitted for fundamental significance under Section 132(2)(1) VwGO.
Revision was admitted because the case raises questions of fundamental importance.
The Court held that a revision proceeding can clarify whether partnerships may act as waste collectors within the meaning of Section 3(10) KrWG and when a commercial collection is deemed terminated.
How costs and dispute value are to be determined for the complaint and revision proceedings.
The dispute value follows the cited provisions of the GKG for both stages.
The Court based the value assessment on Sections 47 and 52 GKG, and for the revision stage additionally on Section 63(1) GKG.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.