ECLI:EU:C:1989:275•Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 June 1989.#Refinarias de Açúcar Reunidas SA (RAR) v Council and Commission of the European Communities.#Application for a declaration that a measure is void - Admissibility - Aids to raw sugar refineries.#Joined cases 250/86 and 11/87.
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 June 1989.#Refinarias de Açúcar Reunidas SA (RAR) v Council and Commission of the European Communities.#Application for a declaration that a measure is void - Admissibility - Aids to raw sugar refineries.#Joined cases 250/86 and 11/87.
ECLI:EU:C:1989:275Eu Chamb 06 CJun 29, 1989
Full text
Parties
In Joined Cases 250/86 and 11/87
Refinarias de Açúcar Reunidas SA ( RAR ), whose registered office is in Oporto, represented and assisted by Nuno Ruiz, of the Lisbon Bar, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the Chambers of Guy Harles, 4 avenue Marie-Thérèse,
applicant,
v
Council of the European Communities, represented by Antonio Sacchettini, Director in its Legal Department, assisted by Antonio Lucidi, a member of its Legal Department, acting as Agents, and by I . Lopes Cardoso, also a member of its Legal Department, acting as Deputy Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the office of Dr Joerg Kaeser, Manager of the Legal Directorate of the European Investment Bank ( Case 250/86 ),
defendant,
supported by
Commission of the European Communities, represented by Luis Antunes and Peter Oliver, members of its Legal Department, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the office of Georgios Kremlis, a member of its Legal Department, Centre Wagner, Kirchberg,
intervener,
and
Commission of the European Communities, represented by Luis Antunes and Peter Oliver, members of its Legal Department, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the office of Georgios Kremlis, a member of its Legal Department, Centre Wagner ( Case 11/87 ),
defendant,
APPLICATION under the second paragraph of Article 173 of the EEC Treaty for the annulment of :
( i ) Article 3 of Council Regulation ( EEC ) No 2225/86 of 15 July 1986 laying down measures for the marketing of sugar produced in the French Overseas Departments and for the equalization of the price conditions with preferential raw sugar ( Official Journal 1986, L 194, p . 7 ) and
( ii ) Articles 2(1)(b ) and 6(b ) of Commission Regulation ( EEC ) No 3214/86 of 22 October 1986 adopting measures for the supply of raw sugar and beet harvested in the Community to Portuguese refineries during the 1986/87 marketing year ( Official Journal 1986, L 299, p . 24 ),
THE COURT ( Sixth Chamber )
composed of : T . Koopmans, President of Chamber, G . F . Mancini, C . N . Kakouris, F . A . Schockweiler and M . Díez de Velasco, Judges,
( the grounds of the judgment are not reproduced )
hereby :
Operative part
( 1 ) Dismisses the applications as inadmissible .
( 2 ) Orders the applicant to pay the costs of the Council and of the Commission .
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.