ECLI:EU:T:2012:281•Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 June 2012.#Meda Pharma GmbH & Co. KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).#Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Community — Word mark ALLERNIL — Application for Community word mark ALLERNIL — Earlier national word mark ALLERGODIL — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Grounds — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.#Joined Cases T‑492/09 and T‑147/10.
Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 June 2012.#Meda Pharma GmbH & Co. KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).#Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Community — Word mark ALLERNIL — Application for Community word mark ALLERNIL — Earlier national word mark ALLERGODIL — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Grounds — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.#Joined Cases T‑492/09 and T‑147/10.
ECLI:EU:T:2012:281Eu Chamb 08 TJun 7, 2012
Full text
Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 June 2012 —
Meda Pharma v OHIM — Nycomed (ALLERNIL)
(Joined Cases T-492/09 and T-147/10)
Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Community — Word mark ALLERNIL — Application for Community word mark ALLERNIL — Earlier national word mark ALLERGODIL — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Grounds — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009
Community trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark — Relative grounds for refusal — Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services — Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 30, 52)
Re:
| Two actions brought against two decisions of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 September 2009 (Cases R 1386/2007-4 and R 697/2007-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Meda Pharma GmbH & Co. KG and Nycomed GmbH. |
Operative part
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the actions; |
|
2. |
Orders Meda Pharma GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs incurred in Joined Cases T-492/09 and T-147/10. |
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.