ECLI:EU:C:2012:627•Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 October 2012.#Prokuratura Rejonowa w Zakopanem v Wojciech Ziemski and Andrzej Kozak.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Sąd Rejonowy w Zakopanem – Interpretation of the concept of ‘technical regulation’ in Article 1(11) of Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations (OJ 1998 L 204, p. 37), as amended by Directive 98/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 July 1998 (OJ 1998 L 217, p. 18) – Obligation on the part of a Member State to communicate to the Commission all draft technical regulations – Law of a Member State concerning games of chance.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – No description of the main proceedings – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C‑31/12.
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 October 2012.#Prokuratura Rejonowa w Zakopanem v Wojciech Ziemski and Andrzej Kozak.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Sąd Rejonowy w Zakopanem – Interpretation of the concept of ‘technical regulation’ in Article 1(11) of Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations (OJ 1998 L 204, p. 37), as amended by Directive 98/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 July 1998 (OJ 1998 L 217, p. 18) – Obligation on the part of a Member State to communicate to the Commission all draft technical regulations – Law of a Member State concerning games of chance.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – No description of the main proceedings – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C‑31/12.
ECLI:EU:C:2012:627Eu Chamb 07 COct 10, 2012
Full text
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 October 2012 —
Ziemski and Kozak
(Case C-31/12)
Reference for a preliminary ruling – No description of the main proceedings – Manifest inadmissibility
Questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Questions referred without sufficient information on the factual and legislative context – Manifest inadmissibility (Art 267 TFEU) (see paras 6, 7, operative part.)
Re:
| Reference for a preliminary ruling – Sąd Rejonowy w Zakopanem – Interpretation of the concept of ‘technical regulation’ in Article 1(11) of Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations (OJ 1998 L 204, p. 37), as amended by Directive 98/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 July 1998 (OJ 1998 L 217, p. 18) – Obligation on the part of a Member State to communicate to the Commission all draft technical regulations – Law of a Member State concerning games of chance. |
Operative part
The reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Zakopanem (Poland), by decision of 13 January 2012, is manifestly inadmissible.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.