The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-1833•Gregory Langadinos v. American Airlines, Inc.
01-1833Court of Appeals for the First CircuitOct 18, 2002
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION--NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
No. 01-1833
GREGORY LANGADINOS,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.,
Defendant, Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. Nancy Gertner, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Boudin, Chief Judge,
Torruella and Howard, Circuit Judges.
Gregory Langadinos on brief pro se.
Tory A. Weigand, Gary W. Harvey and Morrison, Mahoney, &
Miller on brief for appellee.
October 18, 2002
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
Per Curiam. After carefully reviewing the briefs and
record on appeal, we affirm substantially for the reasons given
by the district court. Despite notice and without excuse, the
appellant failed to carry out the court’s orders concerning
discovery and sanctions. He also burdened the court and the
appellee with needless delays. Robson v. Hallenbeck, 81 F.3d
1 (1st Cir. 1996); United States v. One 1987 BMW, 985 F.2d 655,
657 (1st Cir. 1993). The court did not abuse its discretion
in dismissing the action. Velazquez-Rivera v. Sea-Land
Service, Inc., 920 F.2d 1072 (1st Cir. 1990).
Affirmed. Loc. R. 27(c).
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.