The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-1779•Christine M. Varad v. Edward J. Barshak
03-1779Court of Appeals for the First CircuitMar 30, 2004
Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter
Citation Limited Pursuant to lst Cir. Loc. R. 32.3
United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
No. 03-1779
CHRISTINE M. VARAD,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
EDWARD J. BARSHAK,
Defendant, Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. Robert B. Collings, U.S. Magistrate Judge]
Before
Torruella, Circuit Judge,
Cyr and Stahl, Senior Circuit Judges.
Christine M. Varad on brief pro se.
Thomas F. Reilly, Attorney General, and Maite A. Parsi,
Assistant Attorney General, on brief for appellee.
March 30, 2004
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
Per Curiam. This pro se appellant, Christine Varad,
appeals from a decision granting summary judgment for appellee,
Edward Barshak, Varad v. Barshak, 261 F. Supp. 2d 47 (D. Mass.
2003). After careful review of the parties' contentions in light
of the record, we affirm the decision on the Title II claim under
the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12132,
substantially for the reasons stated in the district court's
thorough opinion. The appellee apparently concedes that the
court's rulings on Varad's remaining claims were erroneous and
argues that they should be rejected on the merits. We agree. As
the court's discussion of the facts indicates, 261 F. Supp. 2d at
48-52, these claims were meritless.
Affirmed.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.