The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-1019•J. Roger St. Amand v. Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation
04-1019Court of Appeals for the First CircuitAug 10, 2004
Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter
Citation Limited Pursuant to 1st Cir. Loc. R. 32.3
United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
No. 04-1019
J. ROGER ST. AMAND,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
SMURFIT-STONE CONTAINER CORPORATION ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. Michael A. Ponsor, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Selya, Dyk* and Howard,
Circuit Judges.
A. J. O'Donald, III for appellant.
Kevin B. Callanan for appellees.
August 10, 2004
__________
*Of the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation.
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
Per Curiam. We have read the briefs in this case,
listened attentively to oral arguments, and reviewed the record
with care. We conclude, without serious question, that the
district court appropriately granted the defendants' motion for
summary judgment. The material facts are not genuinely in dispute.
The legal principles that govern this case are well-settled and the
district court applied those principles faultlessly. Consequently,
we summarily affirm the judgment below, substantially for the
reasons set forth in the district court's bench decision of
November 5, 2003, and its subsequent memorandum and order dated
November 6, 2003.
Affirmed. See 1st Cir. R. 27(c).
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.