Scott W. Veale; David T. Veale v. United States of America

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
No. 99-2209
SCOTT W. VEALE; DAVID T. VEALE,
Plaintiffs, Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
[Hon. Steven J. McAuliffe, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Selya, Circuit Judge,
Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge,
and Boudin, Circuit Judge.
Scott W. Veale and David T. Veale on brief pro se.
Philip T. McLaughlin, Attorney General, and Daniel J.
Mullen, Senior Assistant Attorney General, on brief for State
defendants.
David P. Slawsky and Upton, Sanders & Smith on brief for the
Marlborough defendants.
Paul M. Gagnon, United States Attorney, and T. David
Plourde, Assistant U.S. Attorney, on brief for Federal
defendants.

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
October 5, 2000
Per Curiam. The district court dismissed the
amended complaint of appellants Scott W. Veale and David T.
Veale, and appellants appealed. After carefully reviewing
the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm this judgment
for essentially the reasons stated in the district court's
Order, dated September 1, 1999. We add only that there was
no error in the district court's denial of appellants'
motion for a change of venue.
Affirmed. See Local Rule 27(c).

-- 2 of 2 --