In re: Kiwanis Jones

16-14053Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitJul 27, 2016

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-14053-J
IN RE: KIWANIS JONES,
Application for Leave to File a Second or Successive
Motion to Vacate, Set Aside,
or Correct Sentence, 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h)
[PUBLISH]
Petitioner.
Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
BY THE PANEL:
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2255(h) and 2244(b)(3)(A), Kiwanis Jones has filed an
application seeking an order authorizing the district court to consider a second or successive
motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his federal sentence, 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Such authorization
may be granted only if this Court certifies that the second or successive motion contains a claim
involving:
(1) newly discovered evidence that, if proven and viewed in light of the
evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing
evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the
offense; or
(2) a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral
review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable.
28 U.S.C. § 2255(h). "The court of appeals may authorize the filing of a second or successive
application only if it determines that the application makes a prima facie showing that the
Case: 16-14053 Date Filed: 07/27/2016 Page: 1 of 24

-- 1 of 24 --

Case: 16-14053 Date Filed: 07/27/2016 Page: 2 of 24

-- 2 of 24 --

Case: 16-14053 Date Filed: 07/27/2016 Page: 3 of 24

-- 3 of 24 --

Case: 16-14053 Date Filed: 07/27/2016 Page: 4 of 24

-- 4 of 24 --

Case: 16-14053 Date Filed: 07/27/2016 Page: 5 of 24

-- 5 of 24 --

Case: 16-14053 Date Filed: 07/27/2016 Page: 6 of 24

-- 6 of 24 --

Case: 16-14053 Date Filed: 07/27/2016 Page: 7 of 24

-- 7 of 24 --

Case: 16-14053 Date Filed: 07/27/2016 Page: 8 of 24

-- 8 of 24 --

Case: 16-14053 Date Filed: 07/27/2016 Page: 9 of 24

-- 9 of 24 --

Case: 16-14053 Date Filed: 07/27/2016 Page: 10 of 24

-- 10 of 24 --

Case: 16-14053 Date Filed: 07/27/2016 Page: 11 of 24

-- 11 of 24 --

Case: 16-14053 Date Filed: 07/27/2016 Page: 12 of 24

-- 12 of 24 --

Case: 16-14053 Date Filed: 07/27/2016 Page: 13 of 24

-- 13 of 24 --

Case: 16-14053 Date Filed: 07/27/2016 Page: 14 of 24

-- 14 of 24 --

Case: 16-14053 Date Filed: 07/27/2016 Page: 15 of 24

-- 15 of 24 --

Case: 16-14053 Date Filed: 07/27/2016 Page: 16 of 24

-- 16 of 24 --

Case: 16-14053 Date Filed: 07/27/2016 Page: 17 of 24

-- 17 of 24 --

Case: 16-14053 Date Filed: 07/27/2016 Page: 18 of 24

-- 18 of 24 --

Case: 16-14053 Date Filed: 07/27/2016 Page: 19 of 24

-- 19 of 24 --

Case: 16-14053 Date Filed: 07/27/2016 Page: 20 of 24

-- 20 of 24 --

Case: 16-14053 Date Filed: 07/27/2016 Page: 21 of 24

-- 21 of 24 --

Case: 16-14053 Date Filed: 07/27/2016 Page: 22 of 24

-- 22 of 24 --

Case: 16-14053 Date Filed: 07/27/2016 Page: 23 of 24

-- 23 of 24 --

Case: 16-14053 Date Filed: 07/27/2016 Page: 24 of 24

-- 24 of 24 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.