The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-10792•Conraad Hoever v. R. Marks, et al.
17-10792Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitOct 16, 2020
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 17-10792
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 4:13-cv-00549-MW-GRJ
CONRAAD L. HOEVER,
Plaintiff – Appellee-Cross Appellant,
versus
C. CARRAWAY,
Correctional Officer, et al.,
Defendants,
R. MARKS,
Correctional Officer,
C. PAUL,
Correctional Officer Sergeant,
Defendants - Appellants - Cross Appellees.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
USCA11 Case: 17-10792 Date Filed: 10/16/2020 Page: 1 of 2
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, WILSON, MARTIN, JORDAN,
ROSENBAUM, JILL PRYOR, NEWSOM, BRANCH, GRANT, LUCK, LAGOA,
and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.
A petition for rehearing having been filed and a member of this Court in
active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard
en banc, and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service who are not
disqualified having voted in favor of granting rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED
that this case will be reheard en banc. The panel’s opinion is VACATED.
USCA11 Case: 17-10792 Date Filed: 10/16/2020 Page: 2 of 2
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.