The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-10363•USA v. George Pearson, Jr.
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
JANUARY 13, 2010
JOHN LEY
ACTING CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 09-10363
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 03-00343-CR-T-30-MSS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
GEORGE PEARSON, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(January 13, 2010)
Before EDMONDSON, BLACK and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Leonard E. Clark, appointed counsel for George Pearson, Jr. in this appeal of
-- 1 of 2 --
the denial of a motion to reduce sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c), has filed a
motion to withdraw, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
no arguable issue of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the
denial of the motion to reduce sentence is AFFIRMED.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.