USA v. Wilson

10-10647Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitFeb 28, 2011

Full text

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
FEB 28, 2011
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 10-10647
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 2:09-cr-00017-JES-DNF
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM HAMILTON WILSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(February 28, 2011)
Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
Mark. G. Rodriguez, appointed counsel for William Hamilton Wilson in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.

-- 1 of 2 --

1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Wilson’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.