US v. Parnell

10-11047Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitDec 9, 2010

Full text

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
DEC 09, 2010
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 10-11047
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:08-cr-00280-WS-C-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff-Appellee,
versus
KENNETH PARNELL,
a.k.a. Southern_Man2003,
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant-Appellant.
_______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
________________________
(December 9, 2010)
Before EDMONDSON, CARNES and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Neil L. Hanley, appointed counsel for Kenneth Parnell in this direct

-- 1 of 2 --

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Parnell’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.