The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-11731•USA v. Juan Quintanilla-Serrano
10-11731Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitDec 1, 2010
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
DECEMBER 1, 2010
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 10-11731
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-00140-JRH-WLB-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JUAN QUINTANILLA-SERRANO,
a.k.a. Juan Serrano-Quintanilla,
lllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
________________________
(December 1, 2010)
Before BARKETT, MARCUS and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
H. Wilson Haynes, Jr., appointed counsel for Juan Quintanilla-Serrano in
-- 1 of 2 --
this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of
the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable
issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Quintanilla-
Serrano’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. Haynes’s motion to appoint
an interpreter is DENIED as untimely and moot.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.