The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-11937•Carlos Amador Rivas v. Carnival Corporation, d.b.a. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc.
10-11937Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitDec 13, 2011
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
DECEMBER 13, 2011
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 10-11937
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cv-23628-PCH
CARLOS AMADOR RIVAS,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CARNIVAL CORPORATION,
d.b.a. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc.,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(December 13, 2011)
Before CARNES, BARKETT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
-- 1 of 2 --
Carlos Rivas appeals the district court’s order dismissing his case and
compelling arbitration. After we issued our opinions in Lindo v. NCL (Bahamas),
Ltd., 652 F.3d 1257 (11th Cir. 2011), and Henriquez v. NCL Bahamas (Ltd.), No. 09-
16344 (11th Cir. Sept. 6, 2011), we asked Rivas and Carnival Corporation to submit
supplemental letter briefs discussing the effect of those decisions on this appeal. In
his supplemental letter brief, Rivas concedes that our decision in Lindo forecloses his
arguments in this appeal. We agree.
AFFIRMED.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.