The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-12116•USA v. Jose Carreno
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
APRIL 5, 2011
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 10-12116
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-20545-AJ-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSE CARRENO,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
_________________________
(April 5, 2011)
Before EDMONDSON, WILSON and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Hector Flores, appointed counsel for Jose Carreno in this direct criminal
appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of the appellant,
-- 1 of 2 --
because counsel believes that the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493
(1967).
Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of
the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguably meritorious issues of merit, counsel’s motion to
withdraw is GRANTED, and Carreno’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.