Matthew E. Forbes, et al v. Lenox Financial Mortgage, LLC, et al

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
DECEMBER 13, 2011
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 11-10241
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 1:08-cv-02513-CC
MATTHEW E. FORBES,
FORBESGALLAGHER, LLC,
Plaintiffs-Counter Defendants-Appellants,
versus
LENOX FINANCIAL MORTGAGE, LLC,
COGENT CLOSING ASSOCIATES, LLC,
JON SHIBLEY, individually,
TODD PATRICK EHRLICH, individually,
Defendants-Counter Claimants -Appellees.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
_________________________
(December 13, 2011)
Before EDMONDSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges, and EDENFIELD,*
District Judge.
_________________________
*Honorable B. Avant Edenfield, United States District Judge for the Southern Distirct of Georgia,
sitting by designation.

-- 1 of 2 --

PER CURIAM:
After oral argument and careful consideration, we conclude that the
judgment of the district court is due to be affirmed. Plaintiffs-appellants raise two
issues on appeal. First, they challenge the district court’s grant of summary
judgment in favor of Defendant Lenox Financial Mortgage, LLC, and Defendant
Jon Shibley with respect to Plaintiffs’ unjust enrichment claim. Second, Plaintiffs
challenge the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant
Cogent Closing Associates, LLC, and Defendant Todd Ehrlich on Plaintiffs’
tortious interference claim. The district court’s opinion in Docket 154 resolved the
unjust enrichment claim, and the district court’s opinion in Docket 156 resolved the
tortious interference claim. For reasons fully discussed at oral argument, we
conclude that the district court properly resolved both claims. Accordingly, we
affirm the judgment of the district court on the basis of the district court’s opinions
in Docket 154 and in Docket 156.
AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --