USA v. Tim James

11-10530Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitDec 7, 2011

Full text

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
DECEMBER 7, 2011
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 11-10530
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 9:10-cr-80106-DMM-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TIM JAMES,
a.k.a. Tim Jones,
a.k.a. Ian Kanroy Mcknight,
a.k.a. Howard Morrison,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(December 7, 2011)

-- 1 of 2 --

Before TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON and CARNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Howard Greitzer, appointed counsel for Tim James in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18
L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and James’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.