USA v. Glenn Mario Thomoas

11-11147Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitNov 27, 2012

Full text

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 11-11147
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-00193-CG-M-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
GLENN MARIO THOMAS,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
_________________________
(November 27, 2012)
Before WILSON, PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
William Gregory Hughes, appointed counsel for Glenn Mario Thomas in
this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of
the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87
Case: 11-11147 Date Filed: 11/27/2012 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record
reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues
of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Thomas’s convictions
and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2
Case: 11-11147 Date Filed: 11/27/2012 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.