Jose Santos Yanes v. U.S. Attorney General

11-11935Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitJan 10, 2012

Full text

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
JAN 10, 2012
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 11-11935
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
Agency No. A094-443-089
JOSE SANTOS YANES,
a.k.a. Jose S. Yanes Bonilla,
Petitioner,
versus
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Respondent.
__________________________
Petition for Review of a Decision of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
_________________________
(January 10, 2012)
Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

-- 1 of 3 --

Jose Santos Yanes appeals the decision of the Board of Immigration
Appeals that affirmed the denial of his application for cancellation of removal. 8
U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1). The Board found that Yanes was ineligible for cancellation
of removal because he had been convicted of a crime of domestic violence, id. §
1227(a)(2)(E)(i). We deny Yanes’s petition.
The decision of the Board is consistent with the plain language of the
statutes that govern cancellation of removal. Section 1229b(b)(1) provides that, in
cases of exceptional hardship, “[t]he Attorney General may cancel removal of . . .
an alien who is inadmissible or deportable” if he has remained in the United States
continually for ten years, “has been a person of good moral character,” and “has
not been convicted of an offense under . . . [8 U.S.C. §§] 1182(a)(2), 1227(a)(2),
or 1227(a)(3).” Section 1227(a)(2)(E)(i) prohibits an alien from committing “any
crime of violence . . . against a current or former spouse.” Yanes does not deny
that, in 2002, he was convicted in a Georgia court of hitting his wife, which is a
disqualifying offense under sections 1229b(b)(1) and 1227(a)(2). See Matter of
Cortez, 25 I. & N. Dec. 301, 310 (2010). Regardless of his status as an arriving
alien or his eligibility for the exception for petty offenses, see 8 U.S.C. §
1182(a)(2)(A)(ii), Yanes is ineligible for cancellation of removal. See Matter of
Almanza-Arenas, 24 I. & N. Dec. 771, 776 (2009).
2

-- 2 of 3 --

We DENY Yanes’s petition.
3

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.